Signals from the future pulp rectangle

Signals from the Future? (part 1)

Signals from the future pulp rectangleOver the summer, I read a number of reports and articles that tracked trends in philanthropy. These “signals from the future” are the basis for a small series of blog posts.

In June, the Monitor Institute released the What’s Next for Community Philanthropy toolkit for community foundations and their peers. The toolkit kicks off with a report that all types of grantmakers and grantseekers should find valuable, Shift Happens: Understanding How the World is Changing.

Shift Happens summarizes data and other analyses around six categories of global trends that will alter local communities in the next decade:

  1. Changing faces – the new majority in the U.S., immigration, Millennials, and Baby Boomers
  2. Emerging technologies – growing connectedness, big data, information access and sharing
  3. Divided communities – economic inequality, social capital, political polarization, race and ethnicity
  4. Future economy – knowledge economy, globalization, localism, innovation and entrepreneurship
  5. Environmental uncertainty – climate change, disaster efforts, sustainability
  6. Changing philanthropy – donor choice, power of the crowd, responsible business, impact investing, government devolution

To be sure, not all trends will reach all communities in the same way or same timeframe. But, the report would serve as a great discussion item for staff and board meetings and as a useful backdrop for strategic planning efforts. The report’s sections can be downloaded separately and the toolkit provides examples of nonprofits and foundations leaning into these changes.

I was particularly interested in the changing philanthropy section and its graphic of donors’ choices for effecting social change:

Donor choices

The graphic complements those used by Lucy Bernholz in her writing and consulting on the social economy. And, donors’ use of a wider range of social giving tools rings true for me, both in my own giving and in that of friends and colleagues in Pittsburgh and other cities.

Every few years, Monitor has released a report or toolkit helping donors and foundations look ahead. Before the new toolkit, it released What’s Next for Philanthropy: Acting Bigger and Adapting Better in a Networked World in 2010. Foundations and donor families that I knew largely ignored the report. Perhaps my set of relationships wasn’t a good gauge of the larger universe of grantmakers. Or perhaps the report was the right information at the wrong time, with most foundations, nonprofits, and communities in retrench mode as they dealt with the recession. Unfortunately, they lost the opportunity that crisis presents to significantly rethink an organization’s operations, mission, and processes.

It is too easy for grantmakers to ignore documents such as Shift Happens. Some will feel “too small to care” – their values-based giving, passion for existing grantees, and/or internal family dynamics taking priority over any external trends. Many will feel “too big to fail” – using their large endowments and history to bypass or actively work against trends. And others will feel “too shocked to shift” – becoming overwhelmed with the scale of the trends and unable to discern how their grantmaking can react.

Then again, maybe I shouldn’t worry about institutionalized philanthropy paying attention to Shift Happens. Institutionalized philanthropy – endowed foundations, corporate foundations, and government grantmakers – may not be built for accommodating those shifts. As former foundation CEO Gara Lamarche wrote in his recent Democracy and the Donor Class article:

Courageous risk-taking is not what most people associate with foundations, whose boards and senior leadership are often dominated by establishment types.

The current and future generations of donors are more diverse and likely more collaborative than their predecessors. Hopefully, they’ll lead the way in more nimble, creative responses to the signals from the future in Shift Happens.

I attended Grassroots Grantmakers’ “On the Ground” event in Cleveland this past week. The Cleveland Foundation’s Neighborhood Connections program served as a terrific case study for engaging everyday people in community improvement. Its approach draws heavily from the community engagement and network leadership practices developed by Bill Traynor and Frankie Blackburn of Trusted Space Partners. Both were at the event coaching participants on new practices in community building.

The sessions reminded me that early in my blogging, I’d attempted to use Traynor’s practices to the question “What if donors had really cool, trusted places to learn and gather?” Over four posts, I created a hypothetical Community Giving Center that paid attention to: human environment and value exchange, open architecture and easy affiliation, weaving and mobilizing resources, and meaningful giving. At the core, the idea of the Center was about flexibly helping people get their generous stuff done, however they define that along the way.

I still like the idea, but have yet to figure out a business plan to sustain it. Someday…